| Completeness of Report |
Missing |
Incomplete portions |
Satisfactory |
| scenario |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| methodology |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| observations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| interpretations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| suggested improvements |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| conclusions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Appendix 1: Comparison |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Appendix 2: Raw data |
|
|
|
| . |
|
|
|
| . |
|
|
|
| Graphics of work |
Ugly |
Okay |
Looks Great. |
| packaging (cover, etc) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| typography |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| illustrations, if any |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| use of white space |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| overall appearance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| length |
0 (too short or long) |
0 |
|
| . |
|
|
|
| . |
|
|
|
| Literary Quality |
Poor: get help |
Ok, but proof read |
Great |
| spelling/typos |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| grammar |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| paragraph structure |
0 (sloppy) |
0 |
0 |
| section structure |
0 (poor flow) |
0 |
0 (natural flow) |
| clarity of writing |
0 (hard to read) |
0 |
0 (easy to read) |
| style and interest |
0 (boring) |
0 |
0 (interesting) |
| verboseness |
0 (far too wordy) |
0 |
0 (every word counts) |
| . |
|
|
|
| . |
|
|
|
| . |
|
|
|
| Technical Quality |
Poor. |
Okay |
Great |
| scenario |
0 (poor background) |
0 |
0 (explained system, your role, & point of report) |
| methodology |
0 (didn't summarize) |
0 |
0 (concise description of methods used) |
| observations |
0 (hard to understand) |
0 |
0 (good summary of observations) |
| interpretations |
0 (little insight added) |
0 |
0 (strength/weaknesses identified/generalized) |
| suggested improvements |
0 (poor/minor) |
0 |
0 (excellent low-cost design changes) |
| conclusions and recommendations |
0 (didn't conclude) |
0 |
0 (summarized results and recommendations) |
| Appendix 1 |
0 (little insight added) |
0 |
0 (excellent discussion of methods) |
| Appendix 2 |
0 (poorly organized) |
0 |
0 (shows good record-keeping) |
| Sample tasks |
0 (no/poor tasks) |
|
0 (excellent sample tasks) |
| Questionnaire |
0 (irrelevant questions) |
0 |
0 (highly relevant questions) |
| Thoroughness of treatment |
0 (superficial) |
0 |
0 (balanced depth & breadth) |
Grade: A+ ...... A ....... A- ....... B+ ....... B ....... B- ....... C+ ....... C
....... C- ....... D+ ....... D ....... D- ....... F+ ....... F ....... F-
Note : A is superior report; B is better than expected; C is adequate; D is poor; F is
unacceptable
Turn over for evaluator's comments and/or see report. Students are invited to see the
T.A. for further comments on their report.